Leaving the job before you've got another. Applying to a course your family would think was a waste. Writing something you're not ready to admit you're writing. Ending something. Starting something in a field where nobody knows you.
Some goals can't be mentioned, for reasons that are usually sensible. And in removing the ability to tell anyone, you remove every external structure the goal might have had, all at once.
What's gone
Four things, and they're the four that make most goals happen.
Nobody is waiting. No date anyone else is relying on, no disappointment to avoid, no coordination problem. That absence alone accounts for a great deal of what gets done in ordinary life.
Nobody asks. The fortnightly how's that going does enormous work, and it exists for goals people know about.
No feedback. You can't show it to anyone, so the only judgement available is your own — which on any given evening is mostly a report on your mood rather than on the work.
No permission. Time spent on it has to be justified against things with people attached, silently, and it will usually lose. Not because it matters less, but because the other thing has someone who'd notice.
That's not a small handicap. It's the same conditions a founder faces after leaving a job, with the added constraint that you can't manufacture any of it back by telling somebody.
The particular way these stall
They don't fail loudly. They go quiet with a specific character: the sessions get harder to justify rather than harder to do.
The pattern is that the goal always loses the marginal hour. There's an evening free, and there's a thing with a person attached to it, and the private goal is the one that gives way — every time, reasonably, until it hasn't been touched in two months.
There's also a second effect that's harder to see. Because you can't discuss it, you can't think about it out loud, which means the ordinary process of talking a problem into shape isn't available. Private goals tend to stay less well defined for longer, and vagueness is the most common reason anything stalls.
What can be rebuilt
Three of the four, partly, and it's worth doing deliberately.
One person, chosen carefully. Almost every secret goal has one possible confidant — someone unconnected to the situation, or professionally discreet, or far enough away that it costs nothing. A therapist, a friend in a different city, an old colleague. It only takes one, and one restores both the asking and some of the feedback.
A written record instead of a conversation. Where there's genuinely nobody, the log does more work than usual. Writing what happened, what you decided, what you're avoiding — that's the substitute for talking it into shape, and it's most of what a confidant would have provided.
A date rather than a standard. I'll have the application drafted by the 14th works alone, in writing, and it's meaningfully better than when it's ready, which can run forever with nobody to notice.
The fourth — nobody waiting — can't be rebuilt without telling someone. That's the real cost and it should be understood rather than worked around.
The privacy question
Practically, this changes what you need from wherever the goal lives.
A goal you can't discuss is a goal you'd want to write about honestly, and honest writing about a private situation is exactly what you'd stop doing if you were unsure who could see it. Which means the storage matters here in a way it doesn't for swim on Thursdays.
Worth knowing where it actually is. Whether the notes are on your machine or on someone's server. Whether anyone else has access to the account. Whether an export exists that you control.
None of that is paranoia for a goal about a job you haven't left yet, and the alternative is what most people do instead — write blander entries, which removes most of the value.
When keeping it private is the wrong call
The honest counter.
Some goals are private for good reasons and some are private because telling someone would make them real. Those feel identical from the inside, and the second kind is much more common than people admit.
The test is whether you can name the actual consequence of someone knowing. My employer would find out is a reason. It would be embarrassing if it didn't work is not a reason, it's the fear doing exactly what fear does — and a goal kept secret to avoid the possibility of visible failure has arranged things so that quiet abandonment is the easiest available outcome.
There's also a version where the secrecy is protecting a goal that should be examined. Things nobody knows about don't get challenged, and some of them wouldn't survive a single honest conversation. That's not an argument for announcing, but it is an argument for one confidant.
Eleven months
She decides in January to leave and set up on her own. She can't tell anyone at work, obviously, and doesn't tell friends because several are colleagues, and doesn't tell her partner for the first three months because the finances aren't worked out.
The goal is on her list as the plan, which tells you something.
For eleven months it moves in fits. Every time an evening is free, there's something with a person attached — a favour, a deadline, a family thing — and the plan gives way. Nothing about it is ever urgent, because nothing about it is ever anyone else's.
Two things change it. She tells one person: a former colleague, two industries away, over a coffee, once. That one conversation produces a question — what would you need in the bank before you'd go? — that she'd been avoiding for eleven months because there was nobody to ask it.
And the goal gets a proper name and a date. Not the plan but six months of costs saved and three clients lined up, by September.
The gap counter had said forty days, then sixty, then eighty, all year. It had been right the whole time and there was nobody to say so.
Related: Founders and the goal nobody's chasing you about · Writing about work you're ashamed of · Local-first software, explained
Share: